tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12563769.post116210435482566695..comments2023-11-05T04:40:53.265-08:00Comments on Vonny: A Nice Example of How Science Works - The Case of the PentaquarkMark Vondracekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07968005525366534358noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12563769.post-1162273058622608042006-10-30T21:37:00.000-08:002006-10-30T21:37:00.000-08:00Yes. As one of my crustier history profs liked to ...Yes. As one of my crustier history profs liked to say of Poli Sci and Philo " Speculative..speculative"markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16283319657103608208noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12563769.post-1162218800950529932006-10-30T06:33:00.000-08:002006-10-30T06:33:00.000-08:00Touche...perhaps it is better suited to say philos...Touche...perhaps it is better suited to say philosophical arguments and conclusions do not require direct physical tests or evidence, but rather are based on intellectual argument. Better?! :-)Mark Vondracekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07968005525366534358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12563769.post-1162135845768797162006-10-29T07:30:00.000-08:002006-10-29T07:30:00.000-08:00"Philosophy differs from science in that logic dom..."Philosophy differs from science in that logic dominates the process"<BR/><BR/>Or, rather it should ;o)<BR/><BR/>The irrationalist tradition from Nietzsche through postmodernism likes to make a virtue of one-sided logical fallaciesmarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16283319657103608208noreply@blogger.com